<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Freud&#8217;s vaginal orgasm lives again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shakemysugar.com/2008/10/freuds-vaginal-orgasm-lives-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shakemysugar.com/2008/10/freuds-vaginal-orgasm-lives-again/</link>
	<description>Embracing Our Sexual Selves</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 17:32:48 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Petit-Sumrall</title>
		<link>http://shakemysugar.com/2008/10/freuds-vaginal-orgasm-lives-again/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Petit-Sumrall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 01:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shakemysugar.com/?p=36#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Yep, here we go again fighting men and their views about things that they know next to nothing about.  I appreciate that they are trying to understand female sexuality, but I wonder how much they know about their own in the first place?  Is this how they interpret their own physical reactions?

Wait, now that I think about it, it&#039;s not.  The assumption is too often that the woman is at fault when he&#039;s not sexually satisfied.  How twisted is that?  Damned if we do, damned if we don&#039;t.

Men!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, here we go again fighting men and their views about things that they know next to nothing about.  I appreciate that they are trying to understand female sexuality, but I wonder how much they know about their own in the first place?  Is this how they interpret their own physical reactions?</p>
<p>Wait, now that I think about it, it&#8217;s not.  The assumption is too often that the woman is at fault when he&#8217;s not sexually satisfied.  How twisted is that?  Damned if we do, damned if we don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Men!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

